The stereotypic image of the American man is epitomized in cowboy and western lore. Buffalo Bill, who made live performances and traveling extravaganzas at the end of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth centuries, helped create the cowboy and western legend. Hagiographic books and songs were written which extolled the virtue, courage and strength of the cowboy. When movies were invented, this medium picked up where the traveling shows left off and made it easier to mass-produce and market cowboy and western folklore.

            Media moguls became filthy-rich producing westerns. Replacing Christendom's knights in shining armor were cowboys with clean hats, shiny boots, rugged denim jeans and well-oiled Colt revolvers, which could take out the bad guys using Springfield rifles a half a mile away. The villains wore black hats and they always lost. Occasionally, the hero got hurt or wounded but rarely seriously.

            The good cowboy always got the girl and she was always pretty, in an all-American, wholesome way. The men in the audience received tastefully-performed, visual instruction on how to properly hold and kiss their women. Men were always masculine and women were feminine. They were the great ancestors and heroes who conquered the west and bequeathed the United States with a continent.

            History never changes but how the history is portrayed does. The United States morphed from the "Beacon on the Hill" that won World War II to the sinful county that has aborted over 50 million unborn babies. Likewise, Hollywood's portrayal of the cowboy in western movies evolved. Gone are the almost saintly, clearly defined heroes like Shane, from movies made in the 1950's.

            New vengeful, angry, pseudo-heroes played by Hollywood "icons" like Clint Eastwood emerged in the 1970's in movies like High Plains Drifter. Eastwood's nameless character in this film is a reincarnation that comes back from the dead. After killing the town of Lago's bullies in the opening scene, he ultimately extracts revenge on every person who was involved in murdering him in his previous life. Killing becomes graphic and macabre, the language is coarse and the sex is deviant. Christians are portrayed as hypocrites, western culture evil and pastors gutless men who worship money. After killing the bullies, Eastwood's character rapes the local floozy, Callie (who is married) in broad daylight. She resists at first; then enjoys the rape. Callie then tries to kill Eastwood's character because he does not come back for more. She publicly screams at her husband, who refuses to have Eastwood's character arrested for her rape: "I wonder if there is a real man left in this town, one who has a set of balls." Toward the end of the movie, he forces himself on another wife, Sarah, who is also discontented with her husband. This rape is also portrayed as sexually gratifying to the victim. Hollywood at this point in history is portraying married American women as sluts who deserve rape. Before Eastwood's nameless character burns Lago to the ground, he has the town painted red. When asked if the church should be painted red, he says "especially the church." The midget, Mordecai, who is one of the few "virtuous" characters, paints Hell over Lago on the sign at the edge of town right before Eastwood's character kills all of his enemies while burning Lago to the ground. He vanishes into a mirage to end the movie.

            Twenty years later, Eastwood defiles the western even further in the Oscar-winning Unforgiven. His character, Bill Munny, is a bumbling, pig-farming, widower trying to support two children. His deceased wife reformed him of his vices - she is his savior. This is as close as Unforgiven comes to acknowledging God. Struggling to make a living, he is offered an opportunity to collect on a $1,000 blood-bounty raised by some prostitutes to exact revenge on a cowboy who cuts up the face of one of the hookers because she laughs at his "size." The lawman, Little Bill, played by Gene Hackman, is capricious, sadistic and brutal. Munny, who is the "hero," finally reverts to his old, bloodthirsty self-when he gets courage - as he always did - through drinking large quantities of whiskey. American society and culture is denigrated even more in this brutish portrayal than in High Plains Drifter. Munny is androgynous; he does not get the girl and the only girl pursuing him is the mangled prostitute. The other heroines are all whores. His nearly-blind sidekick, the Schofield kid, after scoring his first killing by graphically bushwhacking the offending cowboy in an outhouse, refers to Munny as a "bloodthirsty son-of-a-bitch."Unforgiven ends with a grim, Gehenna-like scene: Munny, brutally exacts revenge by gunning down all the lawmen to payback the town after another buddy, Ned, played by Morgan Freeman, is caught, tortured and executed. Munny threatens to kill everyone and burn the town of Big Whiskey down if anyone tries to come after him.

            The pattern of assault against the cowboy and western (American) culture is clear. Catholic and Christian Americans thought it could not get worse but Hollywood has proven us wrong with Brokeback Mountain. This is movie is a "love story" about two young-adult sheepherders who work a summer job on a sheep ranch in the 1960's. They sodomize each other on the job and continue having unnatural relations with each other at Brokeback Mountain after their summer employment and "romance." This movie is heralded as one of the greatest cinematic miracles ever concocted and has been lavished with praise and award recommendations in spite of its' meager revenues and rather predictable, shallow plot.

What needs to be defined and studied are the subtle and overt messages the movie and Hollywood are trying to instruct the world on. Additionally, there are many ironies that viewers may miss when director Ang Lee unconsciously "lets the cat out of the bag" concerning sodomite relationships.

For the first forty-five minutes the movie focuses on the challenges faced by two young ranch hands working on a sheep ranch. The subtlety about the cowboys in this western, not working with large, sometimes aggressive bovines, particularly bulls, and working instead with fluffy, cuddly, docile sheep should clue the viewer on the type of he-men this movie is trying to create. In a conversation around the campfire, before the buggery starts, both characters describe their Protestant backgrounds, which subtlety defiles Christianity.

The cowboy in the black hat is named Jack Twist. Jack is also the first word used in a coarse, slang term to describe male masturbation and his last name needs no comment on, especially if the subtlety is taken in a sexual context with Jack. In the first homoerotic scene, when Ennis (sounds like anus) Del Mar, who wears the white hat, is taking a nude sponge bath, the camera catches Jack leering at him. Jack is portrayed as the character who takes the lead in initiating the queer "relationship." Viewers are not privy to whether either character, especially Jack, has had previous sodomite encounters. Judging by the fact that Jack seems to be the one initiating the "contact," it would be reasonable to assume he may have. Since their prior homosexual experiences are not explained, viewers may be misled into believing that homosex generally "just happens." I suspect that this is exactly the message that Hollywood wants the audience to be duped into believing. The hat color no longer distinguishes between the good and bad guys. Both willingly indulge in abominations.

            Before sodomizing each other the first time, Jack complains about the staple of their diet being beans. Once moviegoers think about the effect of beans on anal intercourse, the sick irony of this complaint will overwhelm them. What is the movie's message about beans as a staple of a diet? Are beans not conducive to "romantic," anal intercourse?

The first "love" scene and events surrounding it give rise to many questions about homosexuality. Both characters are sitting around a campfire, high up in the mountains, drinking what appears to be whiskey, straight from the bottle, with no chaser. This is obviously a good way to get drunk, very quickly and lose whatever inhibitions one may have. Is the movie trying to tell us that before men try sodomy, they must get really intoxicated before they would ever act out the thought of buggering each other?; or is the movie trying to teach us that homophobia prevents "men" from indulging in sodomy and alcohol is needed to remove false and unnecessary societal inhibitions against homosex?

Ennis passes out under the stars while Jack goes inside the tent. He then wakes up in the middle of the night, shivering, and clambers inside the tent with Jack. Jack puts his arm around Ennis and shortly thereafter, begins to fondle Ennis. Ennis pushes Jack away, but both, in their drunken state, come together, undo each other's pants and then the anal  intercourse begins. There is no intimacy, kissing or foreplay. It is raw, contra-naturam, down-and-dirty sodomy. Brokeback Mountain clearly shows men using their bodies in ways God did not design them to be used.  God called this behavior an abomination.

Jack and Ennis wake up the next day and profess to each other that they are not "queer." The knowledge of right and wrong, natural and unnatural, sin and chastity, and Christianity, do not stop these two from repeating the unclean acts. That is another subtlety (intentional or unintentional is not known) in the film: once novices try sodomy, they often get hooked on it. It must be similar to becoming hooked on methamphetamine; all it takes is trying it one time and a man might become permanently addicted to it.

The ranch supervisor observes, one morning, from a distance, both sodomites, without shirts, frolicking in a rough, wrestling-like manner around the campsite instead of doing their job, which is caring for the sheep. Rough-housing must be the equivalent for homosexuals what holding hands and cuddling is for heterosexuals. Is this normal "foreplay" for homosexuals or has it been tamed down to present a favorable picture of sodomy? The boss rides up and disdainfully tells the "lovers" to move the sheep down the mountain, basically ending their employment. The film implies that the boss' homophobia caused their firing. The reality is that these two perverts were fired because they were not doing the job they were paid to do: protecting the sheep twenty-four hours a day.

The way that Jack and Ennis express the loss of their employment and pending loss of their "relationship" explains the confused and unnatural way homosexuals express their feelings for each other. They start beating each other up; so much for kissing and saying goodbye. At this point the movie infers that if society were not so homophobic, these two sodomites would not have beaten each other up.

After counting out the sheep and the supervisor chastising Jack and Ennis for the loss of sheep, these two head their separate ways. There really is not much said, other than something like "see you around." Jack drives off and Ennis starts walking down the road. Ennis enters what appears to be an abandoned building. He starts crying and slugs the wall. A passerby stops and stares. Ennis shouts, between tears, "What are you looking at?" The viewer is supposed to feel tragedy of the artificial breakup of this "romance" at this point: if only society was more tolerant of homosexuality, this human devastation would have never happened.

After the forced "breakup," Ennis gets married to a plain but attractive girl, Alma, in a Protestant church. She quickly starts having children. Domestic scenes in this household are always chaotic: wailing babies, juggling work schedules and children knocking things over in stores. During one of their love making sessions, Ennis rolls her over and sodomizes her anus.

Jack goes into the rodeo circuit. His life is not easy and it is a struggle to make a living. He has an obviously attraction to men and in one scene, he "hits" on another cowboy in a bar. This object of Jacks advances recoils and walks away. The cowboy who rejects Jack is portrayed as closed-minded and that Jack deserves sympathy because of this rejection. The "unenlightened Cretan" walks off and says something about his encounter with Jack to the men at the pool table. Judging by their expressions, they are not happy hearing that a sodomite is trying to pick men up in their bar. This is the "narrow-minded," intolerant attitude that the makers of this movie seem to want viewers to disapprove of.

Four years into Ennis' marriage, Jack sends him a postcard, inviting him to a "reunion," so they can "reminisce" about all the "great" times they had on Brokeback Mountain. Ennis responds favorably and Jack comes all the way from Texas to pick Ennis up so they can "go fishing." It is very awkward when Ennis introduces Alma to Jack. How does a man comfortably introduce his wife to a homosex "lover," prior to going off for a camping, fishing and sodomy excursion? How Ennis explains his friendship and introduces Jack to Alma is cursory at best. Alma's uneasiness and concern is validated when the two sodomites scurry out the door and start making out next to the house. She is devastated. Fortunately, the children do not see this perversion. The movie shows Ennis having a friendship with one of his daughters as she matures, but it conveniently skips how the neglect caused by Ennis' and Jacks' "romance" affects his girls.

Jack eventually gets married to a very pretty, all-American looking cowgirl, Lureen (is this another play on the word lurid?) who basically rapes him in a breast-displaying, sex scene, on the first date. His marriage is portrayed as an unhappy affair, with a wealthy, farm equipment salesman, father-in-law who constantly ridicules and demeans Jack in front of his family. Jack sires a son with this Lureen. Again, Brokeback Mountain portrays heterosexual marriage as pathetic and disordered.

The movie does not specify how often Jack and Ennis get together to engage in perversion, but it is implied that their encounters are frequent and on a regular basis, with Jack always traveling north to bugger Ennis. These "reunions" continue on a regular basis until Jack's death, around twenty years after the initial "romance." Lureen is flummoxed as to why Ennis never traveled to Texas to "reunite" with Jack. Arguments over Jack's excursions to Brokeback Mountain are never shown in the movie. The only chaos allowed to be truthfully portrayed is from the heterosexual dimensions of Jack's and Ennis' lives. The homosex "getaways" are always portrayed as the serene and the natural thing for both these "men" to do.

Brokeback Mountain vigorously seeks to redefine how men relate to each other in masculine ways like going on camping and fishing expeditions. Brokeback Mountain plants  the pernicious idea in male viewer's minds - that sodomy is a natural thing to do on "manly" excursions. It also seeks to redefine male bonding in a "queer" way. Hollywood now equates men "corn-holing" each other with brotherhood and fraternity. The film also plants the perverse seed in women's minds about what activities might occur when the boys go away for weekend excursions.

Ennis does not appear to engage in any other sodomite relationships but Jack does, getting involved on fishing trips with the husband of one of Lureen's friends. In addition to his new fishing "buddy," Jack also goes into Mexico to get his sodomite fix with male prostitutes. Ennis and Alma eventually divorce after she makes a comment, during foreplay, about his inability to support more children. After the divorce, Ennis is pursued by an attractive girl at a bar. It is not clear if they ever consummate this friendship. She is devastated by his intransigence and eventually leaves him for another man.

On one of their "expeditions" Jack suggests to Ennis that they leave their chaotic family life and build a place on Brokeback Mountain, implying that they will live "happily-ever-after," like some sodomite fairy tale. Ennis, in a rare moment of clarity, explains to Jack what happens to queers who live together. Ennis has a flashback: his father is shown holding each son by the hand as he walks them to see the dead sodomite, lying in a ditch, with a bloody, mutilated genital area. Ennis states that his father may have been the one to do this. This is the first example of the lie that Hollywood perpetuates: that hate crimes are always against sodomites and never perpetrated by homosexuals against heterosexuals or homosexuals against each other. Has anyone ever heard of prison rape or homosexual rape of heterosexuals? If the opinion shapers in Hollywood get their way, homosexual rape of heterosexuals will expand geometrically like sex crimes against women have after the sexual revolution in the 1960's.

Religious intolerance against Christianity is the predominant form of religious bigotry and hate speech practiced in Hollywood. Thanksgiving is portrayed in Brokeback Mountain as chaotic. After their divorce, Alma confronts Ennis at a Thanksgiving dinner. She asks him about why he never brought fish home from all his fishing trips, since she and the girls love fish. Alma bought him fishing gear which he never opened. She told him she knew this because she put a note in with the gear asking him to bring some home but the note was never opened. Alma confronts Ennis' selfishness of putting his sexual perversion over the most basic common courtesy and being considerate toward his family. Also at Thanksgiving, Jack finally confronts his domineering father-in-law and threatens him with violence when Jacks "manliness" is challenged one-time-too-many. The movie again attacks heterosexuality, along with slamming a Christian, American holiday.

Toward the end of the movie, Ennis, who appears to be in his forties, is destitute and drinking heavily. Jack is prosperous and has all the material possessions anyone could want. Their "reunions" stop and Ennis finally calls Jack's home and speaks to Lureen. She coolly tells Ennis that Jack died when a tire he was changing exploded. Ennis envisions that she is lying and a frame showing the mangled victim of the homosexual "hate crime" in the ditch races through his mind. This is the second time this movie perpetuates the myth that hate crimes are only committed against homosexuals and not done by homosexuals against heterosexuals or each other.

The cultural movers and shakers forbid describing homosexual crimes against heterosexuals as hate crimes. They also ban referring to any crime against European descended peoples or Christians as hate crimes. The people who control defining cultural norms control the terms of debate so thoroughly that if you type as a search engine on the Internet: "hate crimes by homosexuals against heterosexuals," the Internet will default and list only hits relating to hate crimes against homosexuals. If rape is a crime of hate, then homosexual rape, which is increasing nationally, is a hate crime also; prison rape is a hate crime, etc. I remember reading an article in a military journal which was written around the time Bill Clinton wrote the infamous, "Don't ask, don't tell" executive order which legitimatized homosexuality in the military. The article described a gang of homosexual predators in the Navy who were terrorizing sailors aboard a ship during the World War II era. The author stated that he slept in his bunk with a pipe wrench for protection. The sodomites were finally court martialed and removed from the ship. As they were being drug off the ship, the crew lined the deck and cheered.

The ultimate hate crime against homosexuals has been and currently is caused when homosexuals knowingly infect each other with AIDS during anal or other forms of unnatural sex. They willingly murdered and are continuing murdering each other by the hundreds of thousands in the United States. These self-inflicted hate crimes dwarf the relatively obscure incidents of "gay bashing" in America. The silence of the media of the savage, suicidal, self-inflicted, wanton AIDS epidemic is staggering. Additionally, the muting by the psychological profession about homosexual self-loathing/hatred which produced and is continuing to perpetuate this genocide is stunning.

Brokeback Mountain ends with Ennis visiting Jack's parents to "console" them. The movie captures how awkward it is for a homosexual "partner" to introduce himself to the other's family. Of course, Jack's father is hostile to Ennis. When Ennis tells him that he wants to take Jacks ashes and spread them over Brokeback Mountain, Jack's father curtly rejects the idea, stating that he knows where the mountain is. The viewer gets the picture that Jack's father knows that Ennis was Jack's friend in a queer way. Jack's mother is more accommodating, understanding and "open minded" about Ennis. Women are usually portrayed by Hollywood as being more open minded and tolerant than men. She lets Ennis visit Jack's room. Ennis hugs one of Jack's shirts, wraps it up and takes it as a memento. Again, the movie's message is that homophobia and bigotry caused this tragedy. Brokeback Mountain demands that society needs to accept the "love" resulting when two men affectionately "corn-hole" each other.

Homosexuality is a disordered existence. The movie wants the viewer to believe that the disorder in sodomite relationships is caused by societal intolerance. The bulk of how homosex behavior is portrayed in Brokeback Mountain is happy, carefree and joy filled. Maybe an accurate portrayal of sodomy is needed, just like accurate portrayals of illicit heterosexual behavior is necessary. The Hollywood film and television industry needs to be sued for damages similar to how corporate tobacco was. Since Americans are acting out on destructive sexual behaviors promoted by Hollywood, maybe litigation could prove a cause-and-effect similar to how the legal system proved tobacco companies used advertising visual images to hook young people on cigarettes. If this type of litigation succeeded, maybe Hollywood could be forced to pay billions to fund medical care for AIDS sufferers, illegitimate children, people with venereal diseases, etc. resulting from the portrayal of sex without consequences in movies and television. This would be a boon to states across the nation which are being financially crippled to pay for the social devastation promoted by Hollywood.

Dr. Paul Cameron provides readers an insight into the sodomite underworld in Exposing the AIDS Scandal. He documents bizarre and sadistic behaviors practiced by homosexuals that even the perverted Marquis de Sade, whom sadism is named after, could never have imagined. Brokeback Mountain portrays sodomy as monogamous and loving. Cameron shows it is anything but loving and monogamous. The only way to wake up Catholics and other American Christians to the homosex lifestyle is to describe various aspects of it in detail, which is what Cameron does in the following excerpts from his book (1):

 

Warning: The following material is extremely explicit and offensive to normal sensibilities.

What Homosexuals Do

A.     Fellatio (oral sex)

Homosexuals admit to fellating almost every one of their sexual contacts and to ingesting semen from about half of these. ...

 B.   Anal Intercourse

The next most common homosexual sex act is rectal intercourse. It too is fraught with biological danger. . About 80 percent of gays regularly participate in this activity.

C.     Rimming (oral stimulation of the anus)

About two-thirds of homosexuals regularly use their tongues to explore the anuses of their sexual contacts and thus ingest biologically significant amounts of feces. .

D.  Golden Showers, Water Sports (drinking or "bathing" in urine)

About 30 percent of gays have "showered" in the urine of others, and about 20 percent have drunk urine. ...

E.     Fisting (inserting a fist or fist and arm into the rectum)

In 1983, well over a third of gays admitted to participating in fisting (inserting the hand and arm, sometimes up to the armpit, into the rectum of sex-partners). The rectum was not designed to accommodate the hand and arm. . Given the various gay misuses of the rectum, it is hardly surprising that the latest review of rectal cancer implicated homosexual practices in a large fraction of recorded cases.

F.      Scat or Fudge Sports (playing with or eating feces)

The latest national random survey found that 17 percent of gays admitted to having eaten and/or rubbed feces of partners. An additional 12 percent reported giving and receiving enemas as part of sexual pleasure.

G.    "Toys" and Other Things

"Toy" is homosexual argot for various objects, including live animals, which are inserted into the rectum - sometimes bottles, carrots, light bulbs or specially designed devices. The risk for contamination is considerable. More recently a small proportion of homosexuals do sex with animals - gerbils are commonly used.

H.    About a quarter of homosexuals dabble in sadomasochism, where "lovers" are beaten or trussed up as part of sexual sport.

The order in which I've presented the various homosexual acts is important, because that's generally the developmental order in which the acts are adopted by individual homosexuals. On the average, gays report having their genitals manipulated by another male at about age 13. ... In counseling, I've noticed that each sexual step is frequently viewed as a challenge and barrier by individuals pursuing homosexual identities.

Number of Partners

... The diary study indicated that, on the average, gays:

1)      fellated 106 different men, and swallowed 50 of their seminal discharges,

2)      experienced 72 penile penetrations of the anus, and

3)      ingested the fecal material of 23 different men per year. Many of these encounters involved activities in which the partners neither knew one another nor exchanged words, and occurred in restrooms, bathhouses and other public places.

                                     

          Describing sodomy in detail does not follow the new moral agenda being pushed by the cultural elites in the United States and throughout what used to be Christendom, who are showering praise on Brokeback Mountain. In fact, this review and Cameron's book are considered hate speech, and thus against the law, in much of Europe and in Canada. This is the type of free speech and democracy that the Bush administration is trying to bless the Moslem world with. It makes sense why Moslems are resisting the United States and why they call America the "Great Satan." We have to ask ourselves how well Brokeback Mountain would have been received and how many accolades would if have been given, if it had showed the "cowboys" fisting, rimming and shoving live rodents up each other's rectums.

            Truthfully talking about homosexuality is verboten in public discourse today. It brings to mind one instance when on a call-in, talk radio show about P.E.T.A and homosexuality, I connected the dots between the two topics by asking the talk show host why P.E.T.A. never condemned the practice of "gerbiling" (homosexuals shoving live gerbils up each other's anuses for sexual pleasure). I dared to state the unthinkable: homosexuals (or heterosexuals) using animals for sexual pleasure is animal cruelty. The "open-minded" and "tolerant" talk show host, to put it mildly, freaked out. He hung up on me and chattered for a couple of minutes about what kind of a sick person would dare to mention such a thing. Obviously, by his reaction, he thought that homosexuals' gerbiling was not the problem but me having the audacity to mention it was a serious problem. Which is worse: me publicly discussing gerbiling, as a demented behavior and cruelty to animals, or homosexuals actually doing this to animals? It is easy to see the cultural rot and new cultural "norms" using this example.

            Pundits and movie reviewers showered praise on Brokeback Mountain. They called it a "love story." Additionally, they marveled about how "faithful" these two were to each other. Much chatter was bantered about the fidelity between this pair of sodomites. The truth, which popular American culture and Hollywood scorn, is that there was absolutely no fidelity and faithfulness between these two buggerers. They cheated on their wives and screwed around on each other. This movie shows how homosexuality exponentially confuses the already complex sexual relations between humans, which is part of the reason (along with mental and physical diseases) why human cultures universally react to it with condemnation and impose severe penalties on it. If the opinion makers in Hollywood get their way, sodomy will become a culturally-accepted norm. When this happens, women and men will be put into the position of competing with members of the same sex and opposite sex for partners. The only way sexual norms can be further confused and assaulted is for children and/or the family pet to be thrown into the list of sexual options for people. Bestiality and pedophilia are the next sexual frontiers Hollywood will assault and try to make accepted social norms.

To put Hollywood's bias against Christianity and Christian morals in perspective, Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, which was and is despised in Hollywood, must be compared with Brokeback Mountain. Gibson's Passion was smeared the very second the idea of making the movie became public. Bigots who never saw it were smudging it as religiously bigoted (Orwellian double-speak) in hysterical, knee jerk fashion. Gibson was denied funding and normal, positive promotion for his movie. He received incredible amounts of negative, hate-filled invective from people who, up to this time, promoted tolerance, diversity and multiculturalism, which in reality only applies to non-Christians in the United States and the West. Gibson eventually funded the movie with his own money. Attempts were made in the movie industry to stop distribution of the Passion and ban it from theatres. Gibson would have shown this magnificent work of art in churches and figured out a way to distribute it. Smelling a buck, movie distributors allowed it to be shown to audiences in theatres across America. It was the blockbuster of the century, grossing over $350 million in the United States and over $700 million in videotape/DVD sales, theatre and video sales worldwide. Hubristic pundits had the audacity to state that Gibson knew it would be a moneymaker. They said that making a huge profit was the only reason he produced the film. The final slap in the face Hollywood leveled at The Passion of the Christ was refusing to grant it the cinematic awards and nominations it was due.

Brokeback Mountain is loved by the cultural elites in Hollywood and the new world order gang, which is shaping American morals. Even with the extensive and seemingly never-ending, positive publicity on every secular talk show, which is probably unparalleled, this movie has been a flop, relative to the positive publicity it has received. In the complex I viewed Brokeback Mountain at, it was given the largest theatre, with stadium seating. I had to laugh when only 20-or-30 people were in the theatre which seated at least 400. Brokeback Mountain was nominated for eight Oscars and scores of various other cinematic awards.

If you go to your local Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant church, you will probably hear nothing about Brokeback Mountain. It is almost like Christian clergy and laymen are ostriches, burying their heads in the sand, pretending this filthy film and the descent into a moral abyss will go away if no one talks about it. It is hard for the Catholic church to condemn this movie because of the homosexual molestation scandal that is bankrupting archdiocese across the United States. The Catholic church has lost the moral high ground and will not condemn the homosexual perversion espoused in this film because many high-ranking clergy knowingly covered up and protected many known sexual predators (primarily homosexual).

            Maybe if Catholic clergy and the leadership practiced their catechism, the current, outrageous, Catholic-clergy sex scandal would not have occurred. The perverted behavior of a small percentage of priest, bishops and church hierarchy does not erase the truth stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 2357.

 

Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

 

The Hollywood/New York pro-sodomy bias is evident in the word the media uses to describe the Catholic sex scandal: pedophilia. The media will not truthfully describe that the overwhelming instances of molestation have been homosexual - men (priests) on teenage boys. The media agenda-setters are careful in how they word this scandal because the word pedophilia creates a mental image in readers and listeners that the victims are infants and young children with both genders being molested equally. If you think this allegation is false, pick up your newspaper or watch your television and you will learn that the media is consistently obfuscating the fact that homosexuals are the preponderant molesters in the Catholic clergy. This is the same media that is waging war on the Boy Scouts and is trying to force them into admitting sodomite scout masters under the banner of "tolerance." The same liars who are screeching about the Boy Scouts being more tolerant of sodomy are not practicing tolerance toward the Boy Scouts ban on homosexual scout masters. The proponents of homosexual Boy Scout leaders are the epitome of hypocrisy and intolerance. There is no doubt what would happen if buggerers became scout masters; the Boy Scouts would become homosexual breeding grounds and a forum for homosexual assaults against young men. If this happens, (it can still be stopped) would the media then call the offending scout masters pedophiles or homosexuals?

The fact that the ruling elites in the media, academia, government and many "Christian" clergy support sodomite scout masters indicates that these fools do not have any problem with homosexual child molestation. What condition will society be in when all forms of pedophilia are decriminalized, then legalized? This is the direction American society is headed. What is next?: legalizing bestiality, polygamy, etc.? Serial, out-of-wedlock polygamy is already legal in America and trillions of tax dollars are used to subsidize it through welfare. Very few Christian clergy and laymen condemn the immoral tax system which subsidizes millions of sinful out-of-wedlock births each year, paternal abandonment and continued fornication.

The traditional, Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant culture of life loses the debate for life and Christianity before the debate begins. Christian leaders' speech is co-opted when they use the language of the culture of death and damnation. They foolishly use the word "gay" to describe a sexual abomination that stinks in God's nostrils. Would the Almighty  use the word "gay" to describe men sodomizing each other? If so, why do almost all Catholic and other Christian leaders use the word "gay" to describe sexual deviants who are heading to Hell? The culture of death and damnation knows the power of words and will fight tooth-and-nail to maintain control of the most rudimentary words we use. Imagine discussing sodomy or abortion with a cultural usurper and not using their words: gay, pro-choice, anti abortion; and using our words: sodomite, abomination, pro-abortion, murderer. The usurper would quickly interrupt and correct the Catholic or Christian. If there was not an immediate, groveling apology and if the proponent of Christ's culture of life continued using unapproved words, it is reasonable to suspect that "tolerant" and "open-minded" advocate of the culture of death would become violent.

Brokeback Mountain is just the latest slide down the slippery slope of perversion and social control promoted by Hollywood. In fifteen years, if the slide continues on its present course, we may be treated to "westerns" where the sheep or cows are buggered by the cowboys or seduced by the cowgirls. Or maybe, Hollywood will have the adult cowboys molesting pre-pubescent boys or girls in fifteen years, followed by bestiality in thirty years - or vice/versa. The pattern of perversion is very clear.

 This film clearly shows men using their bodies in ways God did not design it to be used. "Tolerant" and "open-minded" people who are bigoted against Christianity do not like hearing or reading the eternal truths about sodomy given by the Almighty in Leviticus 18: 22-30:

 

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; such a thing is an abomination. You shall not have carnal relations with an animal, defiling yourself with it; nor shall a woman set herself in front of an animal to mate with it; such things are abhorrent. Do not defile yourselves by any of these things by which the nations whom I am driving out of your way have defiled themselves. Because their land has become defiled, I am punishing it for its wickedness, by making it vomit out its inhabitants. You, however, whether natives or resident aliens, must keep my statutes and decrees forbidding all such abominations by which the previous inhabitants defiled the land; otherwise the land will vomit you out also for having defiled it, just as it vomited out the nations before you. Everyone who does any of these abominations shall be cut off from among his people. Heed my charge, then, not to defile yourselves by observing the abominable customs that have been observed before you. I, the LORD, am your God."

 

God was not playing around with sodomites when he solved the homosexuality abominations in Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19:27-29:

 

Early the next morning Abraham went to the place where he had stood in the LORD'S presence. As he looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah and the whole region of the Plain, he saw dense smoke over the land rising like fumes from a furnace. Thus it came to pass: when God destroyed the Cities of the Plain, he was mindful of Abraham by sending Lot away from the upheaval by which God overthrew the cities where Lot had been living.

 

Will God punish the United States and Europe for legalizing sodomy? We know that He punishes individuals and nations who offend and mock Him. The Almighty gave the Israelites stern instructions on how to correct homosexuality and other perversions in Leviticus 20: 13-17:

 

If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives. If a man marries a woman and her mother also, the man and the two women as well shall be burned to death for their shameful conduct, so that such shamefulness may not be found among you. If a man has carnal relations with an animal, the man shall be put to death, and the animal shall be slain. If a woman goes up to any animal to mate with it, the woman and the animal shall be slain; let them both be put to death; their lives are forfeit.

 

It is clearly stated in Jehovah's laws that homosexuality, incest and bestiality stink equally in God's nostrils and are not to be tolerated. Many foolish contemporary clerics, pundits, scribes and Pharisees are deceiving Christians and non-Christians, telling them that Jesus never condemned homosex behavior. Jesus never specifically addressed sodomy in the Gospels but he was clear about his relationship to the Mosaic law in Matthew 5:17-20:

 

Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven. I tell you, unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

 

Jesus never revoked Mosaic law: He fulfilled it, to include forbidding sodomy, bestiality, incest, etc. Many "Christian" clerics and laymen erroneously state that homosexuality was only forbidden in the Old Testament. This is a lie! Obviously these deceivers/children of the Unclean One have never read verses in the New Testament which condemned sodomy like Romans 1:24-27:

 

Therefore, God handed them over to impurity through the lusts of their hearts for the mutual degradation of their bodies. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and revered and worshiped the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. Therefore, God handed them over to degrading passions. Their females exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the males likewise gave up natural relations with females and burned with lust for one another. Males did shameful things with males and thus received in their own persons the due penalty for their perversity.

 

Jesus clearly states in Mark 9:42-48 what will happen to all the people involved in making films like Brokeback Mountain, which targets young people and teaches them to sin in a depraved manner. They will be punished for inciting Catholics and Christians to go astray and indulge in homosexuality. He also gives extreme measures to sodomites on how to overcome their overwhelming perversions in order to avoid the fires of Hell:

 

Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe (in me) to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck and he were thrown into the sea. If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go into Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire. And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life crippled than with two feet to be thrown into Gehenna. And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. Better for you to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into Gehenna, where 'their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.'

 

These are not the words of a fuzzy, non-committal, non-judgmental, sissy-fag, hippy, flower-child Savior who is tolerant of anything. Suggesting those who lead others astray need to have a millstone tied around their necks and be thrown into a lake or cutting off their hands is potent. Jesus also talks about grinding up people who reject him in Matthew 21:43-44:

 

Therefore, I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people that will produce its fruit. The one who falls on this stone will be dashed to pieces; and it will crush anyone on whom it falls.

 

            The sad thing about this movie is it is the latest of the many tickets to Hell in the world today and very few Catholics and Christians of other denominations seem to "get it." Ultimately, Brokeback Mountain is a movie about damnation. Most of the viewing audience, actors and the children of the Devil in Hollywood who concoct films like this will die unrepentant. This is due to their pride. At their death, they will find out if Jesus is or isn't. This is something I do not want to chance. They do not seem to be phased by this possibility.

            What Hollywood, sodomite activists and many "Christians," are trying to do with this film is to normalize homosexuality, like they normalized fornication and shacking up among unmarried heterosexuals. The norm fifty years ago was for heterosexuals from all backgrounds to get married, then have children. Living together was almost unheard of. It was shameful for unmarried heterosexuals to live together and/or procreate. Now, this is the norm in America. Young people are talking about this movie and are watching it sympathetically and in disproportionate numbers compared to adults. It is an "in" movie to watch. This is Hollywood's plan, which is diabolical.

            Over forty years have elapsed since the sexual revolution in the 1960's. No matter how much propaganda, under the guise of tolerance, is yammered by Hollywood, educrats, politicians, feminists, etc., the shame of illegitimacy and adultery still exists. God created women and men to feel shame for certain acts which will not be erased by modern, sinful, cultural fads. Just like adultery will always produce shame, so will homosexuality. Fads, propaganda and lies will never erase this truth.

The evil movie industry, as long as it is run by its current owners, and foolishly funded by Christians, will never show that sinners like these sodomites can recover if they acknowledge their perversion, sincerely repent and allow Christ to change them.

 

1.  Cameron, Paul. Exposing the AIDS Scandal, Lafayette, LA. Huntington House Inc. 1988 pp 148-151